Guardian Security Insights: The Executive’s Guide to Modern Cybersecurity
In today's digital age, mortgage companies are increasingly targeted by cyber threats. As an executive, you understand the critical importance of...
Information Security Compliance
Add security and compliance to Microsoft 365
BI Reporting Dashboards
Realtime pipeline insights to grow and refine your learning operation
Integrations for Banks & Credit Unions
Connect LOS, core platforms, and servicing system
Productivity Applications
Deploy customized desktop layouts for maximum efficiency
Server Hosting in Microsoft Azure
Protect your client and company data with BankGrade Security
4 min read
Justin Kirsch : Dec 1, 2024 10:30:00 AM
When it comes to cybersecurity, many organizations settle for “good enough.” They check their Microsoft Secure Score, see a passing grade like 70%, and breathe a sigh of relief. But here’s the hard truth: life isn’t graded on a curve, and neither is your security.
A Secure Score of 70% might outperform industry averages, but attackers don’t care about benchmarks. They target vulnerabilities, whether your score is 70% or 90%. Let’s explore why settling for mediocrity is dangerous, how to uncover the hidden risks that Secure Score misses, and what it takes to build a robust cybersecurity process.
Microsoft Secure Score provides a numerical representation of your implemented security measures. While helpful as a baseline, it has a significant limitation: it grades on a curve. A score of 65% or 70% might feel acceptable, but in cybersecurity, a "D" isn’t just inadequate—it’s dangerous.
Here’s why:
Let’s break this down with a story:
One mortgage company we worked with had a Secure Score of 70%. Confident in their security, they felt no need to dig deeper. But when we audited their environment, we found over 40 stale accounts, some with admin privileges. These accounts, left active for over a year, posed a massive risk. Had an attacker found one, it could’ve been a direct entry point to critical systems.
This is why Secure Score alone isn’t enough. You need a process that uncovers hidden risks.
Microsoft Secure Score highlights some vulnerabilities, but many significant risks remain hidden. Here are just a few examples of the many checks that require regular review:
Inactive accounts are a prime target for attackers. Imagine this scenario:
A company has 40 stale accounts, many belonging to former contractors and employees. Several accounts still have admin-level access, granting full permissions to sensitive systems. These accounts haven’t been touched in over a year, but they remain active.
An attacker discovering one of these accounts is like handing them the keys to your organization.
Action Tip:
Personal devices, such as laptops or smartphones, connecting to your network without proper controls are major vulnerabilities.
In one case, 15 unmanaged devices were actively accessing a company’s network. These devices:
One device, used by a remote employee, hadn’t been updated in months and became a perfect entry point for an attacker.
Action Tip:
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is a cornerstone of modern security, but implementation often falls short.
For example, we’ve seen companies where over 20 users started the MFA setup process but never completed it. Despite having MFA technically “enabled,” these incomplete setups left accounts exposed. A phishing attack on just one of these users could bypass MFA entirely.
Action Tip:
So, if Secure Score isn’t enough, what does it take to truly secure your organization? You need two key things:
Here’s a step-by-step guide:
Your security data is likely scattered:
Bring this data together into a centralized repository or dashboard to get a complete view of your security posture.
Action Tip:
Scripts are essential for identifying risks. For example:
Action Tip:
Dashboards make data actionable. Focus on highlighting the most critical risks, such as:
Action Tip:
Even with the best data, improvements won’t happen without accountability. Assign specific team members to:
Action Tip:
Even with dedicated resources, maintaining this process manually is overwhelming. One organization we worked with tried this approach and found it unsustainable. Despite weeks spent building scripts and dashboards, they couldn’t keep up as new threats emerged.
If the manual process sounds overwhelming, it’s because it is. That’s where Guardian Security Insights comes in. This solution automates the heavy lifting, ensuring you can focus on strategic improvements rather than repetitive tasks.
One client started with a Secure Score of 58% and struggled to keep up with manual processes. After implementing Guardian Security Insights, they hit 92% within six months, drastically reducing their exposure to cyber threats.
Cybersecurity isn’t about passing grades—it’s about creating a process that exposes and addresses risks effectively. Whether you choose to build your own system or leverage tools like Guardian Security Insights, the key is to take action.
For a deeper dive into this topic, check out the related Guardian Security Insights podcast or visit the Guardian Security Insights webpage for more details.
Remember, achieving an "A" in cybersecurity isn’t just about hitting a high score—it’s about uncovering and addressing the risks that matter most.
In today's digital age, mortgage companies are increasingly targeted by cyber threats. As an executive, you understand the critical importance of...
In today’s cybersecurity landscape, mediocrity is not an option. Organizations that rely solely on Microsoft Secure Score risk operating under a...
IT professionals are often overwhelmed by the sheer volume of cybersecurity tasks and alerts. From managing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) gaps to...